Taking is not domination

Wanted to write a quick follow up to yesterday’s entry as someone wrote me arguing my point. They stated that they offer domination in, for them, situation of having a domestic slave.

Domination is certainly something awesome and most would say vital you can offer up to a submissive. But receiving services from someone submissive does not make one dominant and does not make that domination. Having a servant clean and cook to your orders but usually just your tastes and guidelines is not domination. Think of it this way as you do your duties at work do you feel submissive and consider your boss a Master? I think not.

Domination is active participation along with direct interaction with another with this dynamic in mind. It is not do this for us please and when you are finished you can go to your room.

For those who are willing to do kinky things, as long as no sex comes from it, for a good domestic slave that is not domination as well. That is just attempting to pay for services rendered by using something different then cash. A slave can pick up that vibe a mile away and just makes the whole situation worse. Now this does work for some but there is usually a sexual component as well.

I wrote about active domination in this entry.

I wrote about trying to pay for obedience with kink in this entry.